Monday, April 30, 2007

Supreme Court redefines "obvious"

So, a patent has to be for something that's "not obvious". But it turns out that until today, the meaning of "not obvious" was not obvious. A federal court had a weird, stupid definition that meant things like getting your cat to chase a laser pointer were patentable.

Not any more! Today, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that you have to actually do something new to get a patent. About time.

No comments: