This some lady Believes

Last night on All Things Considered, a woman talked about what qualities she hopes her newborn child will have in life. She nails it.

I don't know if I have much to add, except I think she names the 3 best qualities to make a good person. It's a beautiful, positive list of things. Caring, honesty, and being able to laugh at yourself. I hope I live up to my potential in these.

Ebert: Video games not art

Roger Ebert has said that video games cannot be art.

Many have written well on this question. What's interesting to me is Ebert's structural claim. He claims that it's impossible to have art in a game. He subscribes strongly to the French auteur theory that art requires a singular author, with a singular vision. And he argues that video games, by giving any control over the story to the player destroys that authority.

I'm willing to accept that the Bergman of video games has not yet emerged, and no art in this form exists yet. But it seems to me that it's possible to tell an interactive story and still maintain a great level of control as the creator. As an actor, it seems fairly obvious to me that the difference between watching a play and playing a video game is the difference between watching a play and starring in a play. Does Ebert believe that actors cannot have artistic experiences, because they are part of the craft? Or would he argue that a truer comparison to gaming would be performing in an improv show, where the actors have more choices?

As an actor, I have many choices in a performance. And there are poor choices, and better choices. Perhaps a game is only art when played well, and the high score is achieved?

Bad Ohio. Bad!

Apparently, in Ohio you can find out how people voted in the last election.

The saddest part is that other states know how to keep this from happening. The article suggests the simple move of randomizing the voter list.

Primary scheduling gone wrong

In a futile bid for relevancy, Florida has scheduled a very early primary in the 2008 presidential election.

I can see why people get tired of their primary votes not mattering. After the first few states, most of the candidates drop out that the apparent victor glides through the rest of the states. However, the value of the first primary being in a tiny state like New Hampshire, with a tiny population, is great. When the candidates can meet with people face to face, talk to them at length about issues, candidates like Jimmy Carter have a real chance.

Florida is a stupid place for an early primary. With 18 million people, you can't win an election with anything but huge amounts of money and TV advertising. That doesn't create good democracy. (Unless we have public funding of campaigns, which is a whole other blog post.)

What would make sense is a rotating primary. Every presidential cycle, you move the first primary. '08 is in New Hampshire, '12 is in Wyoming, '16 in South Carolina. Maybe 2024 in Alaska. Each cycle, you go to a different region of the country, so different voters get to ask about different issues, and the whole country gets to participate, instead of feeling like the Central Committee of Iowa and New Hampshire decide who's president of the rest of us. (I believe that the people of those 2 states take their responsibility seriously, but that doesn't remove the sense that we would like to have a voice as well.)

Hopefully, in the 15 smallest states, there is enough political and regional diversity to offer true variety from year to year. But the simple fact is that Florida, California, or any other state in the 30 most populous, should never be an early primary state. And that includes my home of Oregon. We're too big to do it right.

Boy, would I like to see the Republican primary season start in Washington DC.

Bans on sales to children unconstitutional

So, it turns out that every single attempt to criminalize selling inappropriate video games to children has been ruled unconstitutional. Free speech is tricky. If government can't regulate it, it can't criminalize anything based on content.

Ironically, the government is allowed to regulate sex, just not violence.

This does point out how empty the government's threat is every time they talk about regulating TV or movies or radio. The MPAA and other rating systems are corporate, not government, not because they're afraid of the government, but because if the government did it that would be unconstitutional. And then babies could see naked breasts.

OK, bad example. But they'd also be able to see relationships and violence which their still-forming minds aren't ready to handle.

I like video games. (I can stop any time I want.) But young children shouldn't be seeing some stuff before they're ready. Politicians want credit for protecting the children, but it's illegal for them to do so. And Wal-Mart pretends not to sell video games to youth, but does anyway because it's in their financial interest to sell more games, and to pay a low enough wage that their workers aren't motivated to enforce the rules.

Don't delete that!

So you thought it was safe to empty the trash on your computer. Turns out a guy is being sued for doing that. Of course, the files in his computer's trash were the markers used by Coupons.com to track him as a unique user and keep him from printing off more than one of each coupon.

And they're suing him under the DMCA, for cracking their security "technology". Because the DMCA is a law that makes it criminal to even think about cracking security technologies, even if they're stupid. Or if you have a legitimate reason for cracking them, like they are keeping you from your own stuff.

Hopefully this new legal strategy will fail. Or else we'll end up like the White House, not allowed to ever delete anything. Not that the rules stop them from deleting, either.

Violence attacks video games

After years of violence being blamed on video games, the internet was shut down by violence, surely putting a stop to some online gaming.

Ironic, given how rarely computers actually lead to violence, that real violence should stop pretend violence.